HomeBusinessTechStartup's Plans for Robot Lawyer Nixed After CEO Threatened With Jail

    Startup’s Plans for Robot Lawyer Nixed After CEO Threatened With Jail

    Date:

    Share post:

    - Advertisement -

    by Maggie Harrison

    “…it seems likely they will put me in jail for 6 months if I follow through with bringing a robot lawyer into a physical courtroom.”

    It looks like AI startup DoNotPay’s “robot lawyer” — specifically, an AI-powered earpiece designed to coach defendants through court hearings about things like parking tickets and bill negotiations — won’t be taking the floor next month after all.

    In a major twist, company CEO Joshua Browder has now announced that the case has been pushed back, alleging that prosecutors threatened him with jail time should he bring his robolawyer to a physical court.

    “Good morning!” he tweeted earlier this morning. “Bad news: after receiving threats from State Bar prosecutors, it seems likely they will put me in jail for 6 months if I follow through with bringing a robot lawyer into a physical courtroom.”

    - Advertisement -

    “DoNotPay,” he continued, “is postponing our court case.”

    While it’s known that the bot was set to argue a parking ticket, the specifics of the case, for legal reasons, are mostly under wraps.

    Regardless, this case is — or was, jury’s still (literally) out — a turning point for DoNotPay’s major VC backers, and was to be the first robot-powered case of its kind. Its success or lack thereof was to have some major implications, for the AI marketplace and its investors as well as for the broader legal landscape.

    It’s also unclear what charges prosecutors are allegedly threatening to throw at Browder. But again, this all involves ongoing litigation, so details are bound to be murky. Futurism has reached out to Browder for comment but has not heard back.

    For the time being, Browder says his company will focus primarily on consumer rights cases like “lowering medical bills, canceling subscriptions, disputing credit reports, among other things,” rather than “non-consumer rights legal products (e.g defamation demand letters, divorce agreements and others),” which the entrepreneur called a “distraction.”

    - Advertisement -

    “I think it’s very important for companies to stay focused,” Browder continued in the thread. “Unlike courtroom drama, [consumer rights] cases can be handled online, are simple and are underserved.” (Futurism)

    Artificial Intelligence is about to defend a human in court ‘for the first time ever’

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    In case you missed it..

    Related

    An employer caught a job seeker applying for a role with a ChatGPT cover letter, but it lacked personal information and cost them the...

    By BEATRICE NOLAN Mandy Tang, a career coach and business owner, said she received an application for a part-time...

    Twitter Ban: FG defiant as ECOWAS Court stops Nigeria from prosecuting users

    The Federal Government was defiant yesterday over its suspension of Twitter as the ECOWAS Court of Justice, Abuja,...

    Dear Class of 2017… by Bill Gates

    Congratulations! You’ve just accomplished something I never managed to do—earn a college degree. Between your commencement speaker and every...

    Knowledge of artificial intelligence must be domesticated – Experts

    By Sikiru Obarayese Experts have suggested that the knowledge of Artificial Intelligence must be domesticated in Nigeria for the...